Jump to content
Enpass Discussion Forum

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 05/18/22 in Posts

  1. Thanks @Ivarson. You are 100% right here. @sxc4567PIN locking is a convenience feature and only restricts app access. It does not close the underlaying SQLCipher database handle and an unencrypted database page may still be there in process memory. However, there is an additional level of encryption for the stored passwords with a per item obfuscation key to prevent direct visibility in memory for this case. Though, an attacker with advanced skills can still find the obfuscation keys and decrypt it. Locking with master password is the safest option for Linux as it will close all underlying resources too. Cheers:)
    3 points
  2. No more issues with Dropbox in beta 6.8.2 for Android neither
    2 points
  3. Locking Enpass with a PIN active doesn't close the database AFAIK. If you lock it without a PIN being set, then it's closed properly. In Windows when Full-time TPM support is active, I believe the database is locked properly due to TPM handling the key rather than Enpass itself. I could be wrong though.
    2 points
  4. Hi @Manish Chokwal, I sent the requested files to support except the log files because there aren't any created by the Enpass Manager. If we get a solution for this problem I will post it here.
    1 point
  5. Hi @Dani It is not required to remove the Enpass ver 6.8.0 to install 6.8.1. In the case of mobile devices, you can update the app from the PlayStore/ AppStore. On Desktop devices, you can visit the dedicated Store (For the Enpass Store version) or on your Enpass app, go to Hamburger sign -> help -> Check for updates. Otherwise, please let me know the device on which you are trying to update Enpass, and I'll assist you with the appropriate steps.
    1 point
  6. Thanks for looking into this, Abhishek, I appreciate it So to answer your questions: Just one vault. My vault has 21 files with attachments, and I counted about 64 individual attachments. In total, I have 416 items in that vault. I'm using Google to sync.
    1 point
  7. Hi @all We have now released Enpass beta website version for Mac (ver 6.8.1) and stable version (6.8.1) for iOS devices, which addresses the re-authentication issue for Dropbox. For Mac, please try out the beta version from here and iOS users can update their application from the AppStore.
    1 point
  8. I just tried this on macOS Monterey with the store version of 6.8.0 and I was able to copy things out of notes via the keyboard shortcut and also by right clicking on the selection and choosing Copy. I tried via the menu bar assistant and that worked, too. Can you provide more information about your setup and macOS version? It will be hard for them to fix something if they can’t figure out how to replicate it.
    1 point
  9. Beta is much better. Also seems to have fixed some issues with the Assistant not bothering to show the site's credentials and instead focusing on most used. So far no problems.
    1 point
  10. Thanks. I'm using Windows so that's why it didn't ring a bell.
    1 point
  11. Hi @all Enpass greatly appreciates your patience while we worked on fixing the bug. We have released Enpass beta website version for Windows (ver 6.8.1), which addresses the crash issue for Windows. Please try out the beta version from here and share your findings with us.
    1 point
  12. Hi @all Enpass greatly appreciates your patience while we worked on fixing the bug. We have released Enpass beta website version for Windows (ver 6.8.1), which addresses the re-authentication issue for Dropbox. Please try out the beta version from here and share your findings with us.
    1 point
  13. There is another topic asking for SSH Agent support. Unfortunately, the topic has been already closed without further information whether this will be implemented or not. I would really love to have SSH Agent support in Enpass. My expected behavior of this implementation would be Enpass asking me to unlock the Vault once an SSH Agent request is made (just like auto fill in the browser extension) and then accepting the SSH Agent connection. Is this on the list to be implemented?
    1 point
  14. Manish, thx for that info. I'm aware that I can order items by dragging that menu icon. However, what if I had a number of items that I'd like to drag as one group? Eg have "Contact Details" before "Home Address"?
    1 point
  15. Hi @Manish Chokwal At this time Enpass do not display an new version. It is installed 6.8.0 (Build 1059)
    1 point
  16. Hi @Vinod Kumar, Thank you very much for your reply. I have to say, this sounds really excellent! I read through the linked thread as well; do I understand correctly that, so long as Enpass is locked (for example at the PIN prompt), there is very little risk of data leakage through memory - aside perhaps from UI libraries that are extremely difficult to control anyway?
    1 point
  17. Hello @Ivarson We understand where you are coming from and your concern. Over the last few years, we have received various requests from our users for a Business version of Enpass(to improve the overall security posture of their business), its availability, and our upcoming plans regarding the same. As a result of these requests and suggestions/feedbacks from our B2C customers, working in various organizations, Enpass was able to develop a business version. Hence, for a lot of our existing B2C users, the Business version was long overdue. Therefore, we saw it befitting to announce to our user community that the Enpass Business is out and they can spread the word among their organization. Furthermore, we only plan to send out “Enpass-related news or security-related news” through our app. However, having said that, the last thing we want our users to feel is that Enpass is being intrusive. Although we do plan to reach out to users through email, we felt that we would be able to cater a larger audience via our app notifications. Enpass apologizes for the inconvenience once again and will do its best to ensure that its customers have the best experience a password manager can offer, including reviewing our policies on using notifications inside the app.
    1 point
  18. I wanted to report this because I've been experiencing it more and more lately. It's not just my MacOS devices but also my iPhone too. This is what I keep seeing even though I re-autheticated it yesterday on all devices, I woke up to this error again: Not sure what to do or if it's just me who experience this
    1 point
  19. This really is the core of the issue for me. Running through Rosetta hasn't had an impact on performance, and I haven't noticed a hit to battery. In a vacuum, this wouldn't be a problem, I knew what I signed up for when I got a first generation product. But this is a password manager. It's one of the few applications where fast, timely updates are very important. If there's an exploit in the future, should we just expect our data to be exposed for 2+ years while you guys wrangle your code gremlins? I've worked with Qt before, and quite frankly, I would be mortified if it took me 10 months (since Qt 6.2 was released) to integrate upstream changes. I can't imagine looking my boss in the eye and telling him that the reason something this fundamental is taking so long is because of some deprecations. Qt is a UI framework, it really shouldn't be taking this long to handle a few deprecations. I don't buy the excuse that it's truly taking this long to update your UI, and I don't even want to imagine what hell-spawn spaghetti code you're working with where some deprecations in a UI framework requires a total rework of your codebase.
    1 point
  20. I totally agree with @dahliamma and @pitchblack It is totally unaceptable that two years later, in most cases, this is the only not native application that we are running. You say in the recent release: I CAN'T beleive that your developers have released a BIG update without native support. The password manager perhaps is the most importan app in a computer (at least in my case). Is this a reliable company to trust my most precious data? I'm not sure.
    1 point
  21. Ditto! Similar behavior for me as well.
    1 point
  22. Enpass became aware of a critical remote code execution log4j vulnerability (CVE-2021-44228 194) on Friday 2021-12-10. We do not use Java in our product stack except Android app (log4j not being used). Hence, Enpass is not affected by this vulnerability.
    1 point
  23. Same/similar issue with Enpass 6.8.0 on Mac (OS 12.3.1 Monterey), iPhone (iOS 15.5) or Windows 10. Old previously authorized and sync'd vaults (created by earlier versions of Enpass) synchronize OK, but new vaults cannot be sync'd to the server via v.6.8.0 running on any of the platforms. I suspect the issue is relaying the username or the password (probably the latter) to the server. This happens with WebDAV running on Synology DS418 on DSM 7.1 and WebDAV Server 2.4.3; downgrading the server did not help. Synology troubleshooting could not find anything wrong with the server and in any case the WebDAV server could be successfully logged in via CyberDuck. Downgrading Enpass to v.6.7.4 solved the issue on the Mac. Unfortunately, the iOS app can no longer be downgraded and the issue persist on the iOS (iPhone). I'm wondering if Enpass can make the previous version of the iOS app available as a temporary workaround.
    0 points
  24. While we understand your concern @dahliamma, Enpass would like to assure all that our developers are working on it and the launch of Enpass native macOS app is getting delayed due to extensive migration(as mentioned above). However, we would again confirm that Enpass will be available for macOS natively very shortly. Looking forward to your support and patience.
    0 points
  25. Hello, Glad to know I am not the only one with this behavior. I submitted some info on my WebDav config to help the team find the issue. We cross finger for next one. BR
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...