Travis

Still looking for some feedback as to if this is the "right" way to do what I want. Anyone?

Experimenting with it, I found that adding multiple "URL" fields will work. But I'm not sure if that's the best way to solve the problem.

Suppose I want autofill to work for multiple hosts in the same domain. How should I configure that? Can I use some regular expression in the URL like "*.example.com" or should I add multiple "URL" fields for "host1.example.com" and "host2.example.com" and "host3.example.com"?

Seems I'm not the only one. There's a similar discussion in the Cloud Sync area

I just said more or less the same thing in the IOS forums. I hadn't read this when I posted, but I think it's telling that we both used the same example.

From the FAQ: " And right after entering the (new) password, the downloaded database would get opened, and the sync operation will resume. But still in this case, the master-password of your local device has not been changed. So, if you want to keep the same master-password for all the other devices too, you've to manually change them." This is not what I was expecting. I expected once I gave the "new" password that it would change the master password on the local device (too). I'm having trouble imagining a case where you would want to keep separate master passwords (for the same database) on different devices. Also, how does "the cloud" (whatever one I choose to use) know which password to accept? Imagine this scenario: Assume I have Enpass up and working on two computers, both of which are synchronized to "the cloud" a) I change the master password from computer A. This flows up to "the cloud". b) Next time I use "computer b" I am prompted for the new password. Computer B gets this, syncs with the cloud, but keeps my old master password. c) Some time later I change the "master" password on Computer B (but not to the same "new" password Computer A is using). Now what happens? Does Computer A need to update its idea of the "master" password?

Chrome Extension works fine for me, but I'm on Mac OS, not Windows 10.

+1 for this. Provide a sensible default and allow people to pick. If they want to wait a little longer for the app to open in exchange for more security, let them.

Currently (Jan 8, 2017), there is a 5.4 release for Mac and Windows and Linux, but the "Portable" version of EnPass is still at version 5.3 Does the Portable version need an update? Release notes ( https://www.enpass.io/release-notes/macosx and https://www.enpass.io/release-notes/windowspc/ ) seem to suggest no "major" issues missing from Portable, but I'm still left wondering.