-
Monthly fees
In fact, in 2017 I even paid my first android purchase at $4.99 ;-) However, the $54 is the new price for the one-time purchase. If you only want one year of use (1 year of updates included) it costs $17.99 with the subscription plan.(exactly like a SaaS, except that Enpass is not a SaaS....)
-
Monthly fees
I would be curious to see the percentage of users here who use Android, Windows, IOS and MacOS at the same time and who want pro version for all of them. 3% ? Let's say 5% max? Is that a marketing department's joke? And here another joke: Before, pro version for Android + Windows + IOS + MacOS cost a total of $48.(you can also add Linux too, as Premium features on Linux were free). It's still less money than now, and I'm starting to believe that you really can't count.
-
Monthly fees
If I wanted the Pro version on Android + Windows (which offers almost no advantage) it would have cost me only $23 so it's still a 135% increase! Unless you can't count or blind, It's obviously more money than before...
-
Monthly fees
Paying much more for something you don't need is not what I call saving money no.
-
Monthly fees
It's better than nothing, but it's very expensive for what it is. The price has increased by 350% !
-
Monthly fees
I don't see how that changes my criticism. -You can be sure that pro version will not work for Enpass 7 or will be outated in 2 years, without one-time update possibility. -the android app inside or outside the browser, does not work very well for autofill as I said. (Plus, Dashlane works well outside the browser btw)
-
Monthly fees
I will not pay monthly fees for just shortcuts that I never use, and the browser app works as well as Enpass... (Enpass autofill on android sucks btw) Monthly fees are only justified for SaaS.
-
Monthly fees
A subscription is the stupidest decision they could make. That's one of the only reasons I chose Enpass I would have no hesitation in moving to Bitwarden.
-
Hope dies last, but it dies.
I also don't understand how basic functions can take so long to develop, some password manager projects developed by a single person go faster than they do. For example, I've been waiting for several years to don't have to enter the master password at each startup as it's the case for other password managers... 2 years of development to just add multiple vault (whithout users permissions rights) and a new UI, it's not serious. Fortunately, the app remained at the same price.
- First Beta of Enpass 6 for macOS is out!
-
Permissions rights on multiple vault in Enpass 6
Any news ?
- Second Enpass6 Beta for Android is out!
-
Permissions rights on multiple vault in Enpass 6
Hello, I tested the beta enpass 6, which sounds great, but it would be even better if we could specify the rights on each password for each user who shares multiples vaults. For example on my vault "family" I would like to be able to indicate that for a specific password, only my wife session and my session are able to modify the information, and also for example, that we are the only ones able to see the password in clear but that everyone can make the autofill (even if there is a way to recover the password in clear with a trick for the others, it is not serious, the main thing is that the password is not displayed in an obvious way for childrens)
- Google is Threatening to Remove Apps with Accessibility Services from the Play Store
-
Google is Threatening to Remove Apps with Accessibility Services from the Play Store
It only concern apps on the play store, please don't take off the autofilling and offer the .apk directly on you website without going on play store. Others actors of passwords managers apps are also concerned, even paid services like Dashlane so I think you should not leave besides this very important functionality. I prefer to return with google smart lock rather than copy paste my login and passwords each time.
Avogadro
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited