-
Posts
99 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Posts posted by zyghom
-
-
1 hour ago, pineman said:
Is this, a forum provided for you at no cost by Enpass, really the place to discuss alternative password managers from their competitors?
yes, and only because developers made the Enpass.. you know what they did with 6.x version and why all this discussions started
you should have been here before 6.x - that was really TECHNICAL forum with state of the art answers from devs
now... look around
-
1
-
-
54 minutes ago, GerardoF1975 said:
...
Sadly after 4 years (I started using Enpass on march 2015) and two paid Enpass versions (Windows Store + Android) it's time to search for a new password manager...
I am afraid I am in the same situation
so welcome to the club
someone already said in this forum: if they (developers) did NOT do anything with 5.x it would be MUCH better than what happened to and with version 6.x
eh...
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, hlasserre said:
So I have to pay twice ?
actually even 3 times if you have - like me - iPad, android phone and macOS
-
@OLLI_S I agree with you in 99%
maybe even in 99.9%. ;-)
-
mobile version is paid separately ;-(
-
2 hours ago, Pedro Bat said:
this could be yet the best feature of version 6... a menu option on File > Downgrade to Enpass 5
That's the only feature we need together with CSV export!
+1
-
on first use you should use master password by design - otherwise it is a security issue
-
17 minutes ago, OLLI_S said:
But Bitwarden stores the data in the cloud.
I would never store such sensible data in the cloud, so I quit using Bitwarden (I tested it several months with some harmless entries).perfect but let me know please if you use Enpass offline only then? if so how do you sync between phone and desktop? because if you say you use any cloud solution there is no difference (much at least) between fully encrypted vault from Bitwarden on their server and iCloud/OneDrive/Google/Dropbox (you name it)
on top of that:
1- Bitwarden just got fully audited by 3rd party company and report is available (nothing for Enpass even scheduled)
2- Bitwarden is fully open source (Enpass is proprietary - you have NO IDEA how they implement anything)
3- you CAN implement your own solution (cloud service) for Bitwarden (that is what I am exploring now)
There is NOTHING fully secure - it is only a matter of resources to get things "done" (read: deciphered)
-
Bitwarden imports json
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, xarlatan said:
Bitwarden, pretty easy to set up the self hosted server and it has all the desktop/mobile/browser apps + the code is also available on Github. I really liked Enpass, but the v6 ruined it for me. It's not trustworthy anymore.
"Bitwarden: it's really free, not a fake "free trial free"" - I believe they summed up the Enpass correctly ;-)
-
1
-
-
there is a whole debate about it - pity the developers are not even participating in it
on top of this: if you want to revert to 5.x you need to keep the old file - once you upgrade vault to 6.0 you will not be able to return
-
1
-
-
Keepass for win and its derivates for Android, iOS and MacOS
-
10 hours ago, Rod said:
Thanks appreceated. Will try tomorrow. Will the android version then also work?
I did this for iOS and MacOS
-
44 minutes ago, Rod said:
Thanks for your comments. Could you please provide a little bit more info. Do I need to delete current installation and reinstall from play store? Where do I copy the old file to? I am reasonably IT ok but am not very familiar with the inside workings of enpass. Will my desktop version password then work? Or should I go back to version 5? If so do I need to also copy the vault file to a specific place?
just take the file with vault and put WHEREVER i.e. desktop or so
uninstall/install Enpass and during first run use "open the vault" (or so - I don't remember what is says exactly) and point to the file you stored
Then it shall accept the password
it worked on one of my comps - before that it was just not accepting the password
-
11 minutes ago, Rod said:
If anybody has a way to help me solve this mess then any help will be appreciated.
I had the same issue with one of my installation. The solution for me was: use the file from last backup or vault and use it as NEW vault - not trying to use the old installation. Even if this means you need to uninstall the old one and install fresh and then, instead of upgrade just open the old file.
-
you can copy paste using Command + C and Command + V
old fashioned style ;-)
-
once you opened vault from 5.x in 6.x and saved you cannot open it back in 5.x
so only if you kept 5.0 vault somewhere you can come back
and this is not only very unfortunate but not described anywhere...
-
38 minutes ago, remosito said:
Mac doesn't do backups?
My windows Enpass Backup Folder had Enpass5 backups in it.
it does but I am left with version 6.0 only now
so 5.6 cannot open it
-
most of the features you are working now are cosmetic changes (I believe) - not new functionality related to the security
so audit could be done on major releases
yes, it is costly
but yes, it buys the Customers
-
2
-
-
Hi there,
seeing that 6.0 is not what I was expecting (after few weeks of using it on Mac, iOS and Android) I would like to return to the versions I paid: 5.6 (both Android and iOS)
unfortunately my database has been upgraded to 6.0
how can I return to 5.6?
export from 6.0 to .json is not recognisable by version 5.6
please advice
-
6 months testing and such issues... eh
-
1
-
-
same for notes field - not possible to scroll it even (MacOS)
-
-
Just now, mike_w said:
Nobody here is asking for a backdoor to the master password though. We are saying we have authorized fingerprints on file that have been disabled by an update. We need another update to allow us to use these authorized prints.
that is ok and what I like in new Enpass is: forced use of master password from time to time
so anyway, if finger print is not working you should use your master password
forgetting it must mean: zero
otherwise... I already said it
-
1
-
Other password managers
in Purchasing Enpass
Posted
pricing actually is on the front page so ... ;-)
but the rest I must agree - it used to be better here ;-(