eswstl Posted November 11, 2021 Report Share Posted November 11, 2021 (edited) there are a few domains I encounter where a different port number requires a different login. could enpass be tweaked so that the match against a login is, "https://domain:port-number", and not just "https://domain.com" ? and also shouldn't https:// be enforceable and if not the case yet for certain sites, perhaps allow the enforcement with a checkbox? .. this could strengthen enpass' security as sometimes it is difficult to see whether a site is doing https or http. some browsers hide https at the front of the domain name... and sometimes partial support for https appears with a skewed image on the lock-icon of the site --- often I have to click on the lock-icon area to determine whether I am looking at http or https. just these small improvements can significantlty improve the security features for enpass. -- it will make the product a lot better imho... because then the user only has to set an "https-enable everywhere" checkbox and never have to worry about this. also, it gets annoying to determine which login I have to use because two services I often use are against the same domain with different port numbers(so this requires separate logins) -- could there also be a checkbox for domain-setting matchings? a simple checkbox for "port number matching" against a URL can really benefit users who frequent to sites similar like it. these are also not that great deal requests to implement, yet I presume other users must agree with these features as being an overall improvement for enpass, as Lets Encrypt is freely available everywhere and is no excuse to not having https-enforced for all websites. thanks Edited November 11, 2021 by eswstl 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manish Chokwal Posted November 12, 2021 Report Share Posted November 12, 2021 Hello @eswstl, Welcome to the Enpass Forum. I certainly appreciate your efforts in taking out your time to provide valuable suggestions exclusively with detailed explanation. I have shared it all with the concerned team for further consideration. Your patience is highly appreciated here. #SI-2436 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now